Friday, May 30, 2008

Saturday, May 24, 2008


Notes on the assassin tapes...

A Cancer on the Presidency

...and its name is Hillary

MARCH 21, 1973, FROM 10:12 TO 11:55 A.M. 5

DEAN: ...let me give you my overall first.

PRESIDENT: In other words, you, your judgment as to

where it stands, and where we go now---

DEAN: I think, I think that, uh, there's no doubt

about the seriousness of the problem we're,

we've got. We have a cancer--within, close

to the Presidency, that's growing. It's

growing daily. It's compounding, it grows

geometrically now because it compounds

itself

Compounding. Growing geometrically. Close to the Presidency.

A cancer, and its name is Hillary.

Perhaps, just perhaps her latest assassination bullshit, which for a brief moment betrays her abject, pathological mendacity, finally disqualifies her in the minds of the Delegates and the Democratic Party. For, in that brief moment, her inner monster is finally exposed. Sam Power nailed it early on. Randi Rhodes named it. Both paid the consequences meted out by her various piss-boys, household retainers and other assorted sycophants.

No- this is not some vast right-wing conspiracy. This is not sexism. This is her final cork-screw landing in the oncolological petri dish- a bright light shined for one brief moment on pure evil.



Thursday, May 22, 2008

Mutterings over the graves of soldiers

On Memorial Day we'll hear about men who gave their lives for their country, but many lives were not given, they were taken, and taken stupidly and carelessly.

By Garrison Keillor

  • B
Garrison Keillor

May 21, 2008 | The Current Occupant tossed Nazis into a speech last week, something he rarely does since it only reminds people of Dick Cheney. He likened those who would negotiate with terrorists to those who tried to appease the Nazis, an awkward comparison, since Nazis were self-defined and wore the swastika proudly, and terrorists are anybody we nominate to be terrorists, who may include terrorists, people who know terrorists, people named Terry, or people with wrists. One reason Guantánamo is kept top-secret is so you and I won't know how many innocent people have been locked up there and how little the bureaucracy cares about innocence, which might remind people of the Nazis.

The Nazis have served us well as an embodiment of evil even after they're all dead and buried, thanks to wonderful movies with cruel men with bad skin and guttural voices -- and the word itself, which has an ominous buzz to it, unlike the gentle "communist," a cousin to "communion" and "community," though when it comes to outright hardcore evil, communism outdid the Third Reich hands down. Stalin was the most murderous man in the history of the world, having had a larger victim pool to work with, and yet "Stalinist" is not the epithet it should be.

That's because communism was exploited for short-term political advantage after World War II by Richard Nixon and other weasels of the right, much the way "terrorist" is today, to scare people into acceding to unprecedented secrecy and concentration of power and freedom of bureaucrats from any accountability whatsoever. Spooky old hammerhead politicians found anti-communism to be wonderfully profitable and they rode that horse for years and cheapened the language.

The war on terror, to most people, is a lame joke, and Republicans who've been embedded in Washington too long are now finding that the word "terrorism" has lost its tread. This multitrillion-dollar war is going to wind down, one way or another. The Occupant will hand it off to the next president, who can then negotiate with people who know people who know terrorists and work out a way to extricate our people from the desert.

If a Democrat does it, it will be appeasement, and if a Republican does it, it will go down as a courageous act of statesmanship, but one way or another, it will be done.

I got a letter from a U.S. Marine in Fallujah ("trapped in this heat and smoke ... running in circles that won't change anything") who, though a "right-wing social conservative," asks, "Where are the protests from my contemporaries in America's colleges? Why do I not detect an appropriate sense of urgency from our citizens and elected officials?"

It's only May. You will see more urgency from elected officials as November nears. Sen. McCain is now talking about withdrawal except of course he wants to call it "victory," and Republicans up for reelection are learning to sound a little more thoughtful and even skeptical about the war. In Minnesota, a man is up for reelection who sat on a Senate committee with oversight responsibility for the rebuilding effort in Iraq and who showed no keen interest in the billions of dollars disappearing down rat holes. He is now starting to recover some memory.

Meanwhile it's almost Memorial Day and here is a vet on television talking hopefully about his dream of making a good life who has been horribly burned and grafted back together, his head looks like a candle stub with a mouth and blinking eyes. Your heart goes out to the brave young man. And what choice does he have other than to be brave? It's either that or the life of a potato. But who did this to him?

On Memorial Day we'll hear about men who gave their lives for their country, but many lives were not given, they were taken, and taken stupidly and carelessly. And there has been great public piety about those men and their "sacrifice" on the part of politicians who blithely sacrificed them.

Back in 2001, McCain said that a person couldn't talk policy to the Current Occupant for more than 10 minutes and then his mind wandered and he was anxious to talk about baseball. His impatience with detail was apparently a factor in the disastrous move to disband the Iraqi army. I hope he gets to spend some time in his presidential library in Dallas and catch up on what he missed out on.

(Garrison Keillor's "A Prairie Home Companion" can be heard Saturday nights on public radio stations across the country.)

© 2008 by Garrison Keillor. All rights reserved. Distributed by Tribune Media Services, Inc.

Wednesday, May 21, 2008


DEVOTCHKA...

turning the world upside down

BENEWS update-

Klinton Klaims Kentucky

more on this later...

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

In Hope and Prayers for Edward M. Kennedy


Growing up in Massachusetts the Kennedys were always part of my reality. It was with emphatic resolve that I voted for them- all of them- time and time again. Three of the brothers were stolen from us- just one has survived. And his is a carrying-on of the Kennedy message of love and compassion and equality.

Not a perfect man- and yet a man who calls us to perfection. A loving man dedicated to the Beatitudes.

Let us pray for his recovery.

God bless you, Ted.

Friday, May 16, 2008

Here's a special treat for all those dour, humorless, politically correct old biddies who support the monster in the pink pantsuit and who wrote all those nasty comments about feminist betrayal on the NARAL website. Listen to Rusty Warren- and lighten up.

Lesson on how to kill a zombie...

HILLARY'S LAST SCENE

Thursday, May 15, 2008


WOMEN AND MEN MARCHING TOGETHER
Pro-Choice? Our Choice!

NARAL ENDORSES BARACK!
Gives Lurleen Wallace the boot


NARAL Pro-Choice America




Larger/Smaller Text
Printer Friendly

Watch the video about the endorsement.

Sen. Barack Obama Endorsed!

NARAL Pro-Choice America PAC is excited to announce that it endorses Sen. Barack Obama for president in 2008. Sen. Obama has a fully pro-choice record, and we are confident that as president he will be a champion for women's reproductive rights.

As the senator himself said, "It's not just an issue of choice, but equality and opportunity for all women."


Elections

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Mission Accomplished

Read what the geniuses had to say

Iraq Retrospective: Read The Quotes That Sent Us To War

The Huffington Post | March 20, 2008 12:03 PM





As the war in Iraq enters its sixth year, Christopher Cerf and Victor Navasky have published a "definitive, footnoted, hilarious but depressing compilation of experts who were in error" about the war from the beginning. You can read more about the book -- "Mission Accomplished! Or How We Won The War In Iraq" -- here.

Below, an excerpt from the chapter titled "Their Finest Hour: America Readies Itself To Free The Iraqi People."

CAKEWALK!

"I believe demolishing Hussein's military power and liberating Iraq would be a cakewalk."
- Kenneth Adelman, member of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board, 2/13/02

"Support for Saddam, including within his military organization, will collapse after the first whiff of gunpowder."
- Richard Perle, Chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board, 7/11/02

"Desert Storm II would be in a walk in the park... The case for 'regime change' boils down to the huge benefits and modest costs of liberating Iraq."
- Kenneth Adelman, member of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board, 8/29/02

"Having defeated and then occupied Iraq, democratizing the country should not be too tall an order for the world's sole superpower."
- William Kristol, Weekly Standard editor, and Lawrence F. Kaplan, New Republic senior editor, 2/24/03

2008-03-20-mission.jpgHOW MANY TROOPS WILL BE NEEDED?

"I would be surprised if we need anything like the 200,000 figure that is sometimes discussed in the press. A much smaller force, principally special operations forces, but backed up by some regular units, should be sufficient."
- Richard Perle, Chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board, 7/11/02

"I don't believe that anything like a long-term commitment of 150,000 Americans would be necessary."
- Richard Perle, speaking at a conference on "Post-Saddam Iraq" sponsored by the American Enterprise Institute, 10/3/02

"I would say that what's been mobilized to this point -- something on the order of several hundred thousand soldiers are probably, you know, a figure that would be required."
- Gen. Eric Shinseki, testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee, 2/25/03

"The idea that it would take several hundred thousand U.S. forces, I think, is far from the mark."
- Donald H. Rumsfeld, U.S. Secretary of Defense, 2/27/03

"I am reasonably certain that they will greet us as liberators, and that will help us keep [troop] requirements down. ... We can say with reasonable confidence that the notion of hundreds of thousands of American troops is way off the mark...wildly off the mark."
- Paul Wolfowitz, U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense, testifying before the House Budget Committee, 2/27/03

"It's hard to conceive that it would take more forces to provide stability in post-Saddam Iraq than it would take to conduct the war itself and to secure the surrender of Saddam's security forces and his army. Hard to image."
- Paul Wolfowitz, U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense, testifying before the House Budget Committee, 2/27/03

"If our commanders on the ground say we need more troops, I will send them. But our commanders tell me they have the number of troops they need to do their job. Sending more Americans would undermine our strategy of encouraging Iraqis to take the lead in this fight. And sending more Americans would suggest that we intend to stay forever, when we are, in fact, working for the day when Iraq can defend itself and we can leave."
- President George W. Bush, 6/28/05

"The debate over troop levels will rage for years; it is...beside the point."
- Rich Lowry, conservative syndicated columnist, 4/19/06

WHAT ABOUT CASUALTIES?

"Oh, no, we're not going to have any casualties."
- President George W. Bush, response attributed to him by the Reverend Pat Robertson, when Robertson warned the president to prepare the nation for "heavy casualties" in the event of an Iraq war, 3/2003

"Why should we hear about body bags and deaths? Oh, I mean, it's not relevant. So why should I waste my beautiful mind on something like that?"
- Barbara Bush, former First Lady (and the current president's mother), on Good Morning America, 3/18/03

"I think the level of casualties is secondary... [A]ll the great scholars who have studied American character have come to the conclusion that we are a warlike people and that we love war... What we hate is not casualties but losing."
- Michael Ledeen, American Enterprise Institute, 3/25/03

HOW MUCH WILL IT COST?

"Iraq is a very wealthy country. Enormous oil reserves. They can finance, largely finance the reconstruction of their own country. And I have no doubt that they will."
- Richard Perle, Chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board, 7/11/02

"The likely economic effects [of the war in Iraq] would be relatively small... Under every plausible scenario, the negative effect will be quite small relative to the economic benefits."
- Lawrence Lindsey, White House Economic Advisor, 9/16/02

"It is unimaginable that the United States would have to contribute hundreds of billions of dollars and highly unlikely that we would have to contribute even tens of billions of dollars."
- Kenneth M. Pollack, former Director for Persian Gulf Affairs, U.S. National Security Council, 9/02

"The costs of any intervention would be very small."
- Glenn Hubbard, White House Economic Advisor, 10/4/02

"When it comes to reconstruction, before we turn to the American taxpayer, we will turn first to the resources of the Iraqi government and the international community."
- Donald H. Rumsfeld, U.S. Secretary of Defense, 3/27/03

"There is a lot of money to pay for this that doesn't have to be U.S. taxpayer money, and it starts with the assets of the Iraqi people. We are talking about a country that can really finance its own reconstruction and relatively soon."
- Paul Wolfowitz, U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense, testifying before the Defense Subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee, 3/27/03

"The United States is committed to helping Iraq recover from the conflict, but Iraq will not require sustained aid."
- Mitchell Daniels, Director, White House Office of Management and Budget, 4/21/03

"Iraq has tremendous resources that belong to the Iraqi people. And so there are a variety of means that Iraq has to be able to shoulder much of the burden for ther own reconstruction."
- Ari Fleischer, White House Press Secretary, 2/18/03

HOW LONG WILL IT LAST?

"Now, it isn't gong to be over in 24 hours, but it isn't going to be months either."
- Richard Perle, Chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board, 7/11/02

"The idea that it's going to be a long, long, long battle of some kind I think is belied by the fact of what happened in 1990. Five days or five weeks or five months, but it certainly isn't going to last any longer than that."
- Donald H. Rumsfeld, U.S. Secretary of Defense, 11/15/02

"I will bet you the best dinner in the gaslight district of San Diego that military action will not last more than a week. Are you willing to take that wager?"
- Bill O'Reilly, 1/29/03

"It is unknowable how long that conflict will last. It could be six days, six weeks. I doubt six months."
- Donald H. Rumsfeld, U.S. Secretary of Defense, 2/7/03

"It won't take weeks... Our military machine will crush Iraq in a matter of days and there's no question that it will."
- Bill O'Reilly, 2/10/03

"There is zero question that this military campaign...will be reasonably short. ... Like World War II for about five days."
- General Barry R. McCaffrey, national security and terrorism analyst for NBC News, 2/18/03

"The Iraq fight itself is probably going to go very, very fast. The shooting should be over within just a very few days from when it starts."
- David Frum, former Bush White House speechwriter, 2/24/03

"Our military superiority is so great -- it's far greater than it was in the Gulf War, and the Gulf War was over in 100 hours after we bombed for 43 days... Now they can bomb for a couple of days and then just roll into Baghdad... The odds are there's going to be a war and it's going to be not for very long."
- Former President Bill Clinton, 3/6/03

"I think it will go relatively quickly...weeks rather than months."
- Vice President Dick Cheney, 3/16/03

GREAT BRITAIN RELEASES UFO DATA
Top Secret Material continues to be with-held
YouTube Link provided by Andy Murray

Tuesday, May 13, 2008


HILLARY RIDES INTO WEST VIRGINIA!

Even the beautiful Dora Buchholz now supports Barack

Monday, May 12, 2008



Peet's was not, in fact, a hangout for Berzerkeley radicals or students or whatever 1969 fantasy that may occur to you. It was simply a place, known to a few coffee addicts, to get a great cup of coffee. Al Peet was a somewhat taciturn perfectionist who seemed satisfied with nothing more than turning out the best cup of coffee on the West Coast. He hardly ever smiled- never knew his customers- and simply did his thing. And his thing was the stuff of greatness- perfect coffee- just as the cheese shop next door sold a perfect gruyere.

Alice Waters, Ca. 1970, who lived around the corner, loved Peets.

Is Peet's of 1970 still Peet's in 2008? Good coffee, not great- but yet among the best.

Saturday, May 10, 2008

The Return of Richard Kennett?

For those among us who are following the latest Serponica (probably somewhere between zero and three) this forum thread may be of interest. Follow the backwards links and you'll be hooked in a heartbeat! What such a hooking provides is a brief escape from the oppression of the American Borg- and at least a glimpse- or perhaps an immersion- in a different view of reality. It's a place that I routinely inhabit- the alternate universe- one replete with disinformational ploys, UFOs, conspiracies, and wonder. All is not as it seems, so it seems. Follow the links and be mind-blown. There is another world out there to which you've yet to connect. If the links don't suffice- contact me. I'll provide a path.

Best,

General Striker

smoke 'em if ya got 'em....
This column by Bob Herbert appears in today's New York Times. It's important enough to reproduce in its entirety and so here it is (with a hyperlink to the source.) Hillary and Bill Clinton have resurrected the Nixonian scorched earth paradigm of American political discourse, one most recently embodied by Karl Rove and his mendacious coterie of neo-nazi neo-cons. She thereby betrays her own cloying amorality and her willingness to destroy the Democratic Party for her own personal gratification.

But you don't need my ridiculous commentary. Bob says it all:

Seeds of Destruction

Published: May 10, 2008

The Clintons have never understood how to exit the stage gracefully.

Their repertoire has always been deficient in grace and class. So there was Hillary Clinton cold-bloodedly asserting to USA Today that she was the candidate favored by “hard-working Americans, white Americans,” and that her opponent, Barack Obama, the black candidate, just can’t cut it with that crowd.

“There’s a pattern emerging here,” said Mrs. Clinton.

There is, indeed. There was a name for it when the Republicans were using that kind of lousy rhetoric to good effect: it was called the Southern strategy, although it was hardly limited to the South. Now the Clintons, in their desperation to find some way — any way — back to the White House, have leapt aboard that sorry train.

He can’t win! Don’t you understand? He’s black! He’s black!

The Clintons have been trying to embed that gruesomely destructive message in the brains of white voters and superdelegates for the longest time. It’s a grotesque insult to African-Americans, who have given so much support to both Bill and Hillary over the years.

(Representative Charles Rangel of New York, who is black and has been an absolutely unwavering supporter of Senator Clinton’s White House quest, told The Daily News: “I can’t believe Senator Clinton would say anything that dumb.”)

But it’s an insult to white voters as well, including white working-class voters. It’s true that there are some whites who will not vote for a black candidate under any circumstance. But the United States is in a much better place now than it was when people like Richard Nixon, George Wallace and many others could make political hay by appealing to the very worst in people, using the kind of poisonous rhetoric that Senator Clinton is using now.

I don’t know if Senator Obama can win the White House. No one knows. But to deliberately convey the idea that most white people — or most working-class white people — are unwilling to give an African-American candidate a fair hearing in a presidential election is a slur against whites.

The last time the Clintons had to make a big exit was at the end of Bill Clinton’s second term as president — and they made a complete and utter hash of that historic moment. Having survived the Monica Lewinsky ordeal, you might have thought the Clintons would be on their best behavior.

Instead, a huge scandal erupted when it became known that Mrs. Clinton’s brothers, Tony and Hugh Rodham, had lobbied the president on behalf of criminals who then received presidential pardons or a sentence commutation from Mr. Clinton.

Tony Rodham helped get a pardon for a Tennessee couple that had hired him as a consultant and paid or loaned him hundreds of thousands of dollars. Over the protests of the Justice Department, President Clinton pardoned the couple, Edgar Allen Gregory Jr. and his wife, Vonna Jo, who had been convicted of bank fraud in Alabama.

Hugh Rodham was paid $400,000 to lobby for a pardon of Almon Glenn Braswell, who had been convicted of mail fraud and perjury, and for the release from prison of Carlos Vignali, a drug trafficker who was convicted and imprisoned for conspiring to sell 800 pounds of cocaine. Sure enough, in his last hours in office (when he issued a blizzard of pardons, many of them controversial), President Clinton agreed to the pardon for Braswell and the sentence commutation for Vignali.

Hugh Rodham reportedly returned the money after the scandal became public and was an enormous political liability for the Clintons.

Both Clintons professed to be ignorant of anything improper or untoward regarding the pardons. Once, when asked specifically if she had talked with a deputy White House counsel about pardons, Mrs. Clinton said: “People would hand me envelopes. I would just pass them on. You know, I would not have any reason to look into them.”

It wasn’t just the pardons that sullied the Clintons’ exit from the White House. They took furniture and rugs from the White House collection that had to be returned. And they received $86,000 in gifts during the president’s last year in office, including clothing (a pantsuit, a leather jacket), flatware, carpeting, and so on. In response to the outcry over that, they decided to repay the value of the gifts.

So class is not a Clinton forte.

But it’s one thing to lack class and a sense of grace, quite another to deliberately try and wreck the presidential prospects of your party’s likely nominee — and to do it in a way that has the potential to undermine the substantial racial progress that has been made in this country over many years.

The Clintons should be ashamed of themselves. But they long ago proved to the world that they have no shame.

Friday, May 09, 2008

Peggy Noonan on Hillary the Racist

To play the race card as Mrs. Clinton has, to highlight and encourage a sense that we are crudely divided as a nation, to make your argument a brute and cynical "the black guy can't win but the white girl can" is -- well, so vulgar, so cynical, so cold, that once again a Clinton is making us turn off the television in case the children walk by.
Peggy Noonan on Hillary the Racist

Thursday, May 08, 2008

MS PIGGY PLAYS THE RACE CARD

In comments today Hillary has played her last trump. And it's all about race.

"I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on," she said in an interview with USA TODAY. As evidence, Clinton cited an Associated Press article "that found how Sen. Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me."
In other words, "hard working Americans" (i.e. 'whites') will never vote for a black man- the implication being that Obama supporters are nothing but a bunch of black-skinned slackers. She's made George Wallace proud.

The longer this 'contest' continues the more she exposes her own nascent bigotry. Oink! Oink!

Randi Rhodes may have lost her job for calling her a whore- but who can deny it now? She's shown herself to be not just a whore- but a racist whore to boot.

The longer this 'campagn' goes on the deeper she sinks into the shithole of that last refuge of that well-known rogue's gallery of American scoundrels: the pandering racists. But, then again, it's all about winning, no?
BREAKING NEWS

Despite the fact that she has no chance to win..

HILLARY VOWS TO CARRY ON!


Has important new message for the Democratic Party

"Bite this," she says


Mrs. Clinton in West Virginia on Wednesday. "Bite this," she says

Wednesday, May 07, 2008

The First Black President!!!









The OBF

The evil monster from hell is wounded but is she dead yet?


It seems to have all distilled down to this: Hillary is dead but her flatulent remains are still twitching. And what is the sublime force that sustains her? Simply this: the OBF, The old Bag Factor. The parsing of the election demographics is complete:

Young people- Obama.
Educated people- Obama
Black people- Obama

White old ladies (OB's)- Hillary

And why is that? Why would the most progressive element of the 60's revolution support a monster who's a throwback to Eva Peron? Damned good question. Could it be that they perceive that this is the final possibility for political ascendancy before their immanent date with the soylent green checkout counter? Or might they simply harbor a latent fear of young black men? Hard to say. But we can say this- they are a reactionary force in the body politic. They support Hillary why? Because she has a vagina? Because she has a powerful, perverted husband who greased the political skids? Women are supposed to be all about the protection of their children. But their children reject this pandering pretender by overwhelming margins. Apparently that matters not to the leaky OBs.

But for me- I'll always vote with my kids. The future is theirs, not our's, vagina or no. And they have spoken. And they said: fuckit, let's do it a different way. They said- Barack!. Morons and Old Bags can do or be what they might- but there's a new sheriff in town. There is a beautiful black man in the offing. The world is about to change.



Tuesday, May 06, 2008

OVERCOMING M.S.

Nadja the superwoman on MS.

This is a must read!
Holy shit...
THE RUSSIANS HAVE LANDED!

















Alexashka Wolkovich at the Filmore

Saturday, May 03, 2008


JOHN LEAR REPLIES!

Broadbent and Shawanna threaten libel suit!






A really pissed Steve Broadbent (above)


On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 10:49 AM, John Lear wrote:

Kim,

Please let me know if you are going to post this.


All the best,

John


Here is my take on what transpired at RU.

I was invited over by Zorgon who was invited over by ignorethefacts.

Right out of the gate there were many insults but nothing I haven't come to expect.

Access Denied's emotional immaturity manifests itself every time he opens his mouth.

I met him over at ATS and found out he was a wiring technician for a Chinese guy and his mother. He is also a closet biker

All of his posts, though, would leave the unsuspecting and unwary to believe that he worked for the Air Force Research Laboratory and he said as much many times.

He stated in one post that if ever a flying saucer was recovered that we, all of us at ATS, could be assured that it would probably be given to his company to evaluate.

That of course eliminated him as an employee of AFRL. Then we started doing some checking and turns out he works for a little company with headquarters in the south and as far as education all he had was a 2 year electrical degree.

This may account for the bitterness in all of his posts. I honestly don't know what to attribute his lack of emotional maturity whether it is his failure to have accomplished anything in his life, his lack of education, problems at home or some other factor.

He posted a resume on his website a few years ago and what was interesting was that he listed who he had worked for and then listed their accomplishments instead of what he did for them and his accomplishments.

It's like he wanted to believe that his whole life has not been wasted just splicing wires with twistees, soldering connections and displaying his ignorance on the web.

The Kep Tepi guys seems to be unwarily ignorant having accounted for the missing Boeing 767 engines in the WTC by describing the destruction of the CF-6 and P&W engines under 'tons of steel". Now that's just plain ignorance.

Both yfxxx and Chorleton are the loudest of this pack of feral web coyotes. But I think Chorleton has a slight edge over yfxxx because he can ignorantly howl the longest and loudest.

The rest of the pack are just there to yippity, yip, yip, yap into the night each one trying to yippity yap the loudest and best while clinging to the psycho-babble of intellectual morons like Colin Bennett.

RU could most accurately be described as a feral pack of ignorant bullies whose main accomplishment on our planet is the waste of good oxygen.

John Lear May 3, 2008

Thursday, May 01, 2008

Important new blog by Gary Bekkum

The blog imposes upon us the Overwhelming Question. "O, do not ask, 'What is it? Let us go and make our visit."

Will the infinite multiplicity of dreamists awaken from their tedious arguments all at once?

Is the next pang of the God,

the incipient Bigbang,

immanent?

We report- you decide.

Clinton: Rev. Wright’s comments ‘offensive’

In interview with Fox's O'Reilly, she criticizes remarks of rival's ex-pastor

SOUTH BEND, Ind. - Hillary Rodham Clinton said Wednesday she found remarks by Barack Obama’s former pastor to be “offensive and outrageous” and noted that her Democratic rival had spoken out forcefully against them.
Thanks Hillary! Now you've completed your project of morphing this guy:Reverand Wright


into this guy:Willie Horton

...and on Loofah Billo's show, no less! Well I guess the only thing you've proven is that you're a pandering-pig-of-a-whore. Thanks for providing some great new grist for my, and America's, most beloved iconoclast, Kieth Olbermann!

OINK OINK!